The year is 1963. Transistor
technology is still in its infancy, large format
tape is still king; Philips haven't even invented
the cassette tape yet.
The Akai M-8 was a full-size reel to
reel tape recorder, they were also sold under the
Roberts brand. Built in Tokyo in Japan, these were
made in the era before Japan really got a name for
quality audio equipment.
Audio came from a pair of small valve amplifiers,
consisting of a two stage pre-amplifier using a
single ECC83 and a single ended EL84 power amplifier
capable of around 5 watts RMS. The phono/microphone
stage were powered by a single EF86 with a simple
passive filter network to approximate correct
equalization; the pre-amp also doubled as a record
amplifier when recording. There was also a valve
oscillator on the left channel to power the deck's
erase head.
All stages of the circuit were
cathode biased, the whole thing was completely
unremarkable as far as valves go but single ended
valve amplifiers can always sound good if set up
correctly. The strength of this type of circuit is
its purity, aside from the valves there's very
little else needed to make it work - the signal line
is very clean.

Akai M-8 in original condition (Photo courtesy
of Stuart Lester).
|
Thinking in terms of audio, these
amplifiers have three major strong points:
- Each channel is completely
separate, a true dual mono.
- The signal lines are pure and
uncluttered, something that average audio gear
could rarely claim to be.
- They're powered with valves -
need we say more?
They came to me in a box with many
other parts. In the box was also a design brief with
the major goals:
- Rebuild the amplifiers and
improve their audio quality as much as possible,
remove anything to do with the tape deck.
- Make the VU meters work from the
line level circuits (were originally powered
from the loudspeakers).
- Add a pre-amp section, with 6
switchable inputs: Phono, Tuner, 2 x Tape and 2
x CD/Aux.
- Add tone controls with defeat
switch and also mono/stereo switching.
- Put everything into a case of
some description, preferably styled like a
guitar amplifier or similar.
The first part of the plan would be
to merely get the amps running. This seemed
relatively straightforward, just a matter of
spending a couple of hours connecting the various
runs of wiring which formed part of the play/record
circuit, making sure everything was safe before
power was applied. Then came the first opportunity
to actually hear them - there was a definite lack of
bass and the treble was extremely glassy with lots
of ringing on the midrange, not at all valve-like;
but what was there sounded promising.

Powered up for the
first time, possibly the worst photo
I've ever taken.. |
It was clear that the sound problems were coming
from the small coupling capacitors (the lack of
bass) and the filter components (the ringing and
glassy treble), the distinct roll off at the high
end probably made worse by stray capacitance from
all the old wiring and switches - a large portion of
the circuitry could indeed be removed from each
amplifier and would improve things greatly. The
components used originally were old and never really
intended for audio, changing these would also yield
a large improvement to the sound.

The original schematic. Most of what's in
there can be removed. Original schematic courtesy of
Akai. |
Tone circuits
With the amps themselves working,
the next thing was to begin working out other
aspects of the design. The first thing on the list
would be the tone circuits, because these would
ideally need to be added to each channel as it was
rebuilt. I chose a basic Mullard passive tone
network, I had built these before and they worked
well - one reason these appealed to me was that they
could easily be built around an existing valve
stage, they were relatively insensitive to
impedances of the components around them and also
the filter frequencies could be changed at will
merely by changing a couple of components per
channel. The huge downside to these is the huge
amount of gain I would lose, around 20dB. This is
effectively cutting the signal level by 10, doing
some basic math on the available gain and signal
levels told me that this wouldn't work unless I
could increase the signal levels by enough to
compensate. the only attenuation network was before
the first ECC83 stage, after plotting the loadline
on paper it seemed that I could afford to add
another 20dB there. I was worried about what the
audible effect might be if I drove the valve with a
signal that high, in practice though it worked well.
VU meters
The VU meters might prove a
challenge, a brief test showed that they needed
around 3 volts to drive them into the +3dB red band
and there was nowhere near that kind of voltage in
the signal circuits and in any case the extra load
would degrade the sound quality. So these would each
need to be fitted with a dedicated op-amp to provide
the voltage swing they needed without loading the
sensitive valves.
A small amplifier for each VU would
be ideal, an op-amp could easily provide the voltage
swing and could be designed with enough gain to be
able to use as much shunt resistance as possible
between it and the audio, to reduce any interaction
and hence distortion as far as possible. To keep
things simple, I would try to power these from the
heater windings on the main transformers, in
practice though I would run into problems with this
idea and would end up fitting a separate transformer
for them.
Originally the VUs were fitted with
twin lamps, these were blackened with age so would
be replaced with new lamps. Also a dimmer switch
would be fitted, this would need some kind of
adjustable voltage regulator - a simple LM317 would
be ideal if I could keep it cool enough.
Pre amp
The pre-amp section seemed simple
enough at first glance, merely a selector switch and
a few runs of audio cable, the selector switch being
fitted in place of two of the input jacks on the
right channel's amplifier. However, the shape of the
chassis of the amps and the desired place for the
selector would cause problems and mean long runs of
thin cable, not something I'd want on a quality
audio system - besides, it would become a nightmare
to connect everything together. Also, a good quality
wafer switch would prove far too large to fit into
the space where the switch was meant to go.
I decided to switch the inputs via
signal relays, this meant more cost and complexity
but meant that all audio switching could now be done
on the rear panel, with only a minimal length of
wiring to run through. Also, we could now use a bog
standard rotary switch - which would work fine and
cope easily switching the 5 volts to each relay coil
- without it having any effect on the audio. Nothing
wrong with a standard rotary switch, they give a
nice click as you turn them, this along with the
switchover click of the relays makes it sound quite
chunky. Also they're fairly rugged and should last a
very long time.
Tape record outs wouldn't be a
problem, as on most equipment I'd drive them
straight from the line inputs. The pre-outs might
cause issues however, as modern transistor
amplifiers tend to be more of a load than valves are
used to. I decided to run the pre-outs straight from
the output of the second ECC83, really there was no
other way. Not the perfect solution but in practice
it worked well.
The cabinet
The cabinet wouldn't be a major
problem, from the start I was planning on building a
basic cabinet from sheet MDF, something which would
be strong enough and which could be covered in some
kind of material. Covering material - a dark fabric
- had already been sent, I wasn't sure how difficult
this would be to cover but I decided to worry about
that later.
Conclusion
So, we finally had the makings of a
plan. There was a lot more to do but things were
slowly starting to come together.
On to part 2